The Importance of a Virtual Support Team in Navigating Regulatory Landscapes
Understanding the Need for Virtual Support
In today’s rapidly changing regulatory environment, organizations are increasingly recognizing the vital role of virtual support teams. These teams provide managers with enhanced capabilities to navigate and adapt to evolving legislation and regulations. The proliferation of regulatory data vendors in recent years has made it easier for firms to supplement their in-house government relations teams, aligning these resources with organizational objectives.
The Approach of Larger and Smaller Firms
Larger firms often choose to bolster their in-house efforts through partnerships with external data vendors, trade associations, and lobbyists on retainer. This strategy allows them to have a comprehensive approach to government relations. In contrast, smaller organizations might rely more heavily on outsourcing their sensing and influencing activities. While this can lead to increased efficiency and mitigate brand risk, it may also come with limitations. Relying solely on associations may not always align with specific firm priorities, especially in niche areas such as labor policies, which could diverge significantly from broader industry concerns.
The Need for Broad Sensing Capabilities
For global organizations that offer a diverse range of investment products, it is crucial to maintain a wide lens on legislative changes across multiple jurisdictions. Different regulatory changes can impact various parts of a firm’s operations differently. This underscores the importance of a thorough and inclusive sensing strategy that captures the nuances of regulatory shifts.
Bridging Connections within the Organization
The connection between a sensing group and the broader organization cannot be overstated. It’s increasingly beneficial for members of government relations teams to also participate in Regulatory Assessment and Response Execution (RARE) virtual teams. This ensures that when legislation impacting the organization is identified, there’s an established process for effectively communicating with relevant internal stakeholders, such as compliance or operations teams.
Integrating Risk Sensing into Strategic Development
Risk sensing should be a pivotal component of organizational strategy development. Elevating the government relations group to a central position within leadership enables a proactive approach to identifying external risks, which are essential in shaping strategic initiatives. By embedding this function within the decision-making framework, organizations can cultivate a more resilient and forward-thinking strategy.
Harnessing Data and Analytics
Advancements in data and analytics are revolutionizing the government relations function. The launch of the eRulemaking program in 2002 marked the beginning of an analytical era, granting electronic access to pending legislation. Over time, analyst teams have developed sophisticated systems for data collection, analysis, and reporting, enabling organizations to derive insights effectively.
Larger investment firms may conduct their own legislative analyses while still looking to enhance their insights through outsourcing arrangements. Meanwhile, mid-sized and smaller firms can gain significant cost efficiency by leveraging external data and analytics services. Sharing the costs of regulatory data across departments can further optimize resources and ensure that a broader array of stakeholders benefits from valuable insights.
Strategies for Effective Influence
The history of lobbying in America dates back to William Hull in 1792, who, despite his heroic reputation, faced challenges in influencing government decisions. In contemporary times, organizations engage in various strategies to influence policymakers, extending beyond direct lobbying. Grassroots initiatives, media campaigns, and collaborations with think tanks bolster these efforts and help shape public perceptions.
Today’s firms are also increasingly lobbying federal agencies during the rule-making process, as demonstrated by the notable influx of lobbying during the development of the Department of Labor’s Fiduciary Rule. This expanded engagement reflects an understanding that influence must encompass a broader range of interactions with regulatory bodies.
Measuring the Impact of Government Relations
One of the ongoing challenges in allocating resources to government relations is the difficulty in quantifying the impact of these efforts. Unlike more tangible business activities, it can be challenging to directly link government relations activities to financial outcomes. However, organizations can explore several avenues to gauge their effectiveness:
-
Historic Reviews of Influence: Utilizing data to track the outcomes of lobbying efforts over time can provide valuable insights. Many industry associations already undertake analyses of their lobbying successes, which can serve as a foundation for tracking an organization’s key issues.
-
Attributing Impact: Some studies indicate a correlation between lobbying and corporate profitability, suggesting that political factors might contribute to improved profitability across various industries. While the specifics for the investment sector can be murky, this perspective shifts government relations from a traditional cost center to a function with demonstrable business value. Recognizing government relations teams for their roles in influencing positive regulatory outcomes can further underscore their significance.
Cultivating a Coordinated Approach
A well-coordinated effort surrounding the sensing and influencing of the regulatory environment can greatly enhance an organization’s ability to respond proactively. By fostering collaboration among teams and leveraging technology, firms can create a cohesive strategy that prepares them for the complexities of regulatory compliance. The establishment of robust sensing mechanisms enables organizations to not only anticipate challenges but also to align their business goals with the regulatory landscape effectively.